Shoes News Jimmy Choo Sigerson Morrison 127x200 Shoes News: Sigerson and Morrison out at eponymous brand, Jimmy Choo back at Choo?It’s not often that anything in the shoe world actually rises to the level of “news,” but it seems like some big changes are afoot at some of your favorite brands. As such, it seemed like the right time to bring you our first installment of Shoes News, which we’ll run any time the footwear industry finds itself in some state of flux that could be potentially important to customers.

This edition brings us word of shakeups, either current or potential, at both Jimmy Choo and Sigerson Morrison and makes us wonder, what’s in a name? For details on how things are changing, and what it could potentially mean for your ever-growing shoe collections, kindly follow along with us after the jump.

Jimmy Choo to buy back Jimmy Choo? As many of you probably already know, the Malaysian shoe designer who put the Jimmy Choo in Jimmy Choo is no longer involved with the shoe line that bears his name. Choo founded the line jointly in 1996 with then-Vogue UK accessories editor Tamara Mellon, but sold his 50% stake in the company in 2001. Choo’s split from Mellon was nothing if not acrimonious, but now that TowerBrook, the majority shareholder in Jimmy Choo London (Mellon owns 15%) is looking to sell, Fashionista.com reports that Choo might be making a return to the label that bears his name.

Choo has hired Daniel Stewart as an advisor to help him find investors to place a £500 million bid for the controlling share of the company, and although others are also interested in bidding (most notably LVMH), Choo’s clout in Asian markets and his design background could make him a potentially attractive fit for the brand if his offer was financially sound. And if he returned to the company, Tamara Mellon would surely leave. Choo fans – what say you about this development? Would you like to see a creative shakeup within the line? I know I would.

[via Fashionista.com]

Sigerson and Morrison out at Sigerson Morrison. Although the potential for a Jimmy Choo shakeup leaves me curious and optimistic, the news that Sigerson Morrison founders Kari Sigerson and Miranda Morrison have left the brand does not. The designers spent 20 years building the brand and its little sister Belle, but Marc Fisher Footwear, the label’s parent company, has announced their departure along with a planned restructuring of price points for both lines. Fall 2011 will be the founders’ last collection with the company, and New York magazine reports that they plan to stay together and pursue other footwear opportunities.

My guess is that Belle will be getting less expensive while Sigerson Morrison ups its price point a tad, and the differentiation in price structure is the only thing that I like about this news at all. Despite the fact that the brands were priced a bit too similarly for Belle to be looked at as a true diffusion line that could attract a different set of customers than the main collection, Sigerson and Morrison have done great work over the past several seasons and produced many a pair of covetable, well-made shoes. Hopefully they’ll find a new project to work on quickly.

[via NYMag.com]

No related posts.

  • Chris

    Oh yeah ! Jimmy Choo (I think he sold his 50% stake for $10 million GBP in 2001) needs to rescue the brand that bears his name. Their designs have gotten stale, and they keep rehashing the same stuff.

    In addition, Tamara Mellon seems a bit pompous (at least in the videos I have seen), considering its not her name or her design skills driving the name. Although the company has expanded (due to its investors), it looks like its going to cost Jimmy 50x more now (10 years later).

    Jimmy Choo SHOULD be Jimmy Choo !

  • shueaddict

    Sorry, Chris, I disagree. Tamara Mellon’s flair (an her dad’s money, initially) took this little workshop from making bespoke foortwear for Vogue photo shoots to world wide recognition. Charlotte Olympia can only hope !!!

    As for Miss Mellon, she might be pompous but she’s laughing her botoxed face off, sitting on 150 mil and doing Christian Slater. Hats off to her !!!!

    • Chris

      Perhaps you misunderstood, for I’m not sure what you disagree with. My point was simply that Jimmy Choo himself was/is the artist, much like Christian Louboutin or Valentino Garavani (who also enjoyed the attention of Vogue’s editor in chief, so not sure what your dig is there). The problem is, artists usually aren’t the best business people. Likewise, business people usually aren’t the best artists.

      Jimmy Choo has expanded its presence and footprint under Ms Mellon. Kudos to her for that. However, the designs have suffered somewhat as “business” decisions have often trumped fashion decisions. For example how many iterations of the “Clue” or “Glenys” or the “Tube” before market saturation ? The cost to add another color, or fabric, as opposed to a new design, are minimal. The margins are much better, but someone (the artist) needs to step in and say “enough”, lest the fickle consure become bored.

      Other OEM’s, like YSL, do the same thing. Take the “Tribute”, which is a popular design. However, at some point, you want to say, “Oh, another Tribute”. I have two – that’s enough. High end should never become too predictable, or mainstream, for then it loses its cache.

      The fashion industry has always had, and will always have, power stuggles. Valentino ran into difficulties because design mattered at any expense – until there was no money left. That left the door open for a couple of “business” types, eventually Permira.

      In summary, the best of both worlds would be a reuniting for a common goal. However, there seems to be some bad blood that won’t allow that to happen. Perhaps whomever puts up the $ this time will have the faith in Jimmy Choo as a designer, simultaneously putting into place checks and balances to allow the business to grow and thrive, while nurturing creativity.

      Maybe Ms. Mellon can lend a hand to Christian Louboutin, who certainly suffers no lack of creativity. The company, however, could use some serious business expertise.

      Ciao.

      • Amanda Mull

        We have the best commenters. I agree with all of this wholeheartedly.

  • steffie

    Love the commentary Chris! Thanks for the interesting read :)